Tiktok首席执行官周受资出席美国众议院委员会听证会，美国或封禁Tiktok引发网友热议

译者
晓梦

2023-03-24 23:49:24

网文来自网友原文翻译投稿，所有言论皆不代表本站立场 | 本文文字/图片来自网络，侵删 | 点击页眉也可刷新 | 本文内容仅供娱乐，不作任何严肃之用途

Tiktok首席执行官周受资出席美国众议院委员会听证会，美国或封禁Tiktok引发网友热议

本文译自Youtube，原标题：TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testifies before House committee as lawmakers push to ban app | full video

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew is testifying before the House Energy and Commerce Committee as efforts to ban the Chinese-owned social media app gain momentum in Washington. The hearing is focused on TikTok's consumer privacy and data security practices as well as its relationship with the Chinese Community Party.

TikTok首席执行官周受资（Shou Zi Chew）在众议院能源和商业委员会（House Energy and Commerce Committee）作证，与此同时，禁止中国拥有的社交媒体应用的努力在华盛顿愈演愈烈。听证会的重点是TikTok的消费者隐私和数据安全做法以及它与中国GC党的关系。

（观察者网讯）美国当地时间23日上午10时，TikTok首席执行官周受资出席美国国会众议院能源和商务委员会听证会，回应来自美方议员所谓“国家安全”等方面的问题。

综合“Insider”、“Vox”等美媒报道，在这场长达4个多小时的听证会上，以“与互联网时代脱节”而著称的国会议员们再度献上多个“名场面”，提出了诸如应用程序“是否需要接入WiFi”、“如何得知用户年龄”等缺乏实际意义，只为“泼脏水”而服务的离谱问题。不光让现场的周受资一度无言，将听证会开成“网络知识普及大会”，也成为了TikTok用户群嘲的对象。

“今天整个TikTok上都是卡特（议员）那张大脸……”报道称，TikTok上满是吐槽此次听证会内容的视频，有视频在短短3小时就获得了近40万的播放量，点赞近4万，其中传播最广泛的一则视频的播放量已经超过100万次。源源不断的批评声斥责这些议员们对他们正在发难的这款应用根本毫无了解，反倒让“美国人在世界舞台前看起来显得非常愚蠢”。

美国政客对互联网社会“毫无知情”，更是对年轻一代“漠不关心”，这场本是针对TikTok平台的听证会，同样引发包括推特等用户的不满。一位美国网民在其点赞超6万的视频中表示，这群议员根本不懂社交媒体，也不在乎TikTok CEO的解释，而是更在乎美国企业的游说。另一位美国网民则干脆在他点赞数超15万的视频中呼吁，“美国年轻人们，我们能不能投票把这群国会老爷们选下去，他们一点都不关心我们，一点都不。”

听证会后，TikTok上满是吐槽、玩梗的视频

尽管这场听证会打的是“保护美国人的数据隐私和儿童安全”的旗号，但不计其数的TikTok用户和网友在直播后批评这些国会议员们不仅对TikTok的了解知之甚少，也没有给TikTok首席执行官周受资一个公平的发言机会，一边胡乱给人扣帽子，一边又“粗暴”“野蛮”地不时打断对方发言解释。

AWaffle

i wish congress would actually represent Americans and work to make our lives better instead of this BS

我希望国会能真正代表美国人并努力让我们的生活变得更好而不是像这样胡说八道。

Jameson Henigan

Why must our congress make us look absolutely incompetent and useless??? None of these folks know what they’re talking about apparently and over half look like they have one foot in the grave… We need to vote these people out.

为什么我们的国会一定要让我们看起来完全无能和无用？？？显然，这些人都不知道自己在说什么，超过一半的人看起来好像一只脚已经踏进了坟墓……我们需要投票淘汰这些人。

Nicolae Girnet

This is like explaining rocket science to children.

这就像给孩子们解释火箭科学（译注：意即比较高深难懂的事情）。

Crispy

This is why we desperately need younger people in our governments. It’s abundantly clear that these people have no clue what they are talking about regarding the internet.

这就是为什么我们的政府中迫切需要年轻人的原因。很明显，这些人对他们正在谈论的互联网上的内容毫无概念。

Emma Vincent

Notice how everyone is literally reading from a script but this man is speaking straight forward. And then the Congress men and women have the audacity to be arrogant towards him like he has to follow their script. Like how is this real? For this to be the GOVERNMENT and have this level of unprofessionalism and ignorance is so embarrassing

请注意，每个人都在读剧本，只有这个人（即Tiktok的CEO）在直白地说话。然后，国会里的男男女女都厚颜无耻地傲慢地对待他，好像他必须按照他们的剧本行事一样。对于政府来说，存在这种程度的不专业和无知是如此的令人尴尬。

Loc Nguyen

This committee is a disgrace to its citizens. I can understand the CEO arguments better than the members of the committee that won't even let him answer theirs questions. They are undermining the CEO's intellect.

这个委员会是公民的耻辱，我比那些甚至不让Tiktok的首席执行官回答他们问题的委员会成员更能理解首席执行官的论点。他们正在侮辱Tiktok的首席执行官的智商。

Kiya Pryor

I am absolutely flabbergasted!!!! This whole speech at the beginning…..??? I’ve been using TikTok for for years and I’ve actually learned more about my mental health and tips that I can use and it has helped so much. I’ve learned about things happening around the world that I don’t hear on the news. This whole thing is just an embarrassment.

这着实让我目瞪口呆！！！！开头的整个演讲…？？？多年来，我一直在使用TikTok，实际上我已经了解了更多关于我的心理健康和我可以使用的技巧，TikTok帮了我很多忙。我了解了世界各地正在发生的但没有在新闻上听到的事情。这整件事都让人感觉尴尬。

IAmFromMars

The congressman asked why Ticktok cannot has drug related content not 100% cleaned but Douyin(a chinese version of tiktok only available in China) can do it. He basically asked why US law is more tolerent to drug issues than China. Anyone who releases drug related content on China media platforms will be in jail. US should challenge its law system instead of challenge tiktok.

有位国会议员问为什么Tiktok无法100%清除与毒品有关的内容，但抖音（一种仅在中国提供的中文版Tiktok）却可以做到，他基本上是在问为什么美国的法律对毒品问题比中国更宽容，因为任何在中国媒体平台上发布与毒品相关内容的人都将被关进监狱。美国应该质疑其法律体系而不是质疑Tiktok。

I thought a hearing was to let the person actually respond to their questions, not interrupt him incessantly.

我认为听证会是为了让当事人真正回答他们的问题而不是不断地打断他。

Курманбек Базаров

Asking for the revenue of Tiktok is like asking for a person's bank balance. Imagine if someone asked you the same question "What is your bank balance? Can you give a rough number?" not everyone will feel like disclosing such information publicly.

询问抖音的收入就像询问一个人的银行余额。想象一下，如果有人问你同样的问题“你的银行余额是多少？你能给出一个粗略的数字吗”会怎样？并不是每个人都愿意公开披露这些信息。

Christine Matteson

God, Congress...please. They are so embarrassing. Do some research. Must we constantly show our ignorance?! Make America Smart Again. Get dark money out of politics, and put up some younger, brighter, candidates that better represent Americans, not people who will do the bidding of the corrupt corporations and billionaires that own them.

上帝啊，国会...拜托。他们真是太尴尬了，请做一些研究，难道我们一定要不断地表现出我们的无知吗？！请让美国再次变得聪明一些。把黑钱从政治中抽走，推举一些更年轻、更聪明、更能代表美国人的候选人而不是那些会听从腐败的公司和拥有这些公司的亿万富翁的命令的人。

Typical_republican654

The lawmakers acted like little kids wouldn't let the man speak half the time

议员们表现得像小孩子一样，他们有一半的时间都不让这个人说话。

Ragnar Lothbrok

Bans on TikTok could have a significant and harmful impact on the free expression of ideas by users of the app. A ban could also prevent Americans from accessing a popular platform that is beneficial for creative expression, economic growth, and communication. Furthermore, a ban could impede on American businesses' ability to reach key global markets, as well as a vast user base that is estimated to be around 800 million. Additionally, it could limit the ability of social media influencers to share their content with a global audience as TikTok is a significant platform for this purpose.

针对TikTok的禁令可能会对该应用的用户自由表达想法的权利产生重大而有害的影响。禁令还可能阻止美国人访问一个有利于创造性表达、经济增长和沟通的流行平台。此外，禁令可能会阻碍美国企业进入关键的全球市场（估计约有8亿的庞大用户群）的能力。此外，这可能会限制在社交媒体上有影响的人与全球观众分享内容的能力，因为TikTok是实现这一目的的重要平台。

weizhen zhou

As a Chinese and media professional, I didn’t even download TikTok on my phone. But these congress man and woman sound like they are unaware of what they are talking about �� it doesn’t make any sense. Could have gone a better direction if they have any sort of legitimacy built into their brain.

作为一名中国人和媒体专业人士，我甚至没有在手机上下载TikTok。但这些国会议员听起来好像并不知道自己在说什么，这没有任何意义。如果他们的大脑中内置了任何合法性，他们本可以朝着更好的方向发展。

HeyMJ

Tiktok is partnering w/Oracle to manage, secure, protect, maintain and store user data. Oracle is a solid US Corp w/global Gov & Biz contracts. The committee tribunal was a poor performance by congressional members; making grandiose statements w/no actual fact-finding Q&A or substance.

Tiktok正在与甲骨文合作来管理、保护、维护和存储用户的数据。甲骨文是一家可靠的、拥有来自全球政府和商业合同的美国公司。委员会中的国会议员的表现不佳，他们发表了浮夸但缺乏实际的事实调查问答或实质内容的声明。

joyce chia

It’s obvious bullying and rude of some of the congressmen. Always running out of time and just give a one sided questioning. What’s the point having this 5 hour session.

Using TikTok, it’s the people’s choice. To be honest, I have never seen any distressing videos in Tiktok until I know of after I’ve watch this. I’m a user of other social media platforms for more than 10 years and in fact I’ve seen distressing videos out there instead. Mental health responsibility comes in many forms and thru other channels I.e. government and family. Keep a lookout on your love ones. Stop pointing fingers.

一些国会议员显然是在欺凌而且十分粗鲁，他们总是提出一个片面的问题然后不给对方时间回答。如此，这5个小时的听证会有什么意义？

使用TikTok是人们的选择。老实说，我从来没有在TikTok上看到过任何令人痛心的视频，直到我看完这场听证会之后我才知道（TikTok上存在令人痛心的视频）。我使用其他社交媒体平台上10多年了，事实上，我在那里看到过很多令人痛心的视频。心理健康的责任有多种来源，如政府和家庭。留意你爱的人，别再指手画脚了。

ney vioney

Interesting, seems like the congress deeply concerns children's moral values and desperately trying keep them way from all contents relate to so-called Uyghur genocide , violence ect. But wait, whose media and drama series relentlessly promoting marijuana and substance abuse every second, I believe those content will deeply contaminate kid's mental health as well ? When it comes to severe human right issues such as gun violence ，police brutality, promiscuity, child marriage, abortion, those congress folks and lawmakers turn blind eyes. But when anything remotely associates with China or Russia, congress will bolt from their chairs and function like the world class moral exemplars, sparing no effort to criticize these two countries. The sudden shift in tone has left me pondering the authenticity and their real purpose of their newfound outrage.